The biggest story on the BBC news website is ‘Royals' fury over topless photos’ now don’t get me wrong I do appreciates nice boobs, I have been a fan/slave to them for many years, but is it really a story worth so much attention?
End of the day she has breasts, most women tend to have them, and yeah you know what they could be a good pair, they could have been the thing that caught Prince Willy's eye in the first place, but is the fact she whipped them out on holiday and some reporter managed to keep his hand steady long enough to take some un-blurred pictures a good enough reason to make headlines around the world?
They might try and wrap it up by saying it’s an issue about privacy for our Royals yada yada yada, but the vast majority of people opening the story or searching Google for the images are men and some ladies purely looking to knock one out (or knock one in if your female) to pictures of her baps, and they couldn’t care less if there has been an intrusion into her privacy or not, they want to see God’s milk bottles, and they couldn’t be happier.
With everything happening in the world today did the BBC and other media outlets really need to make this their major story? Isn’t that a tad bit sad? I don't blame the horny people rushing for their zipper with delight because they are generally quite normal and simply reacting to our most basic of human needs, but playing up to them to improve sales or viewing figures to your website is lazy journalism at best and probably how some of you found your way to this page proving my point.
If the media of this country didn’t make a shit storm of these stories then the demand for them wouldn’t be so high. I'm sorry if Kate is upset that her chesticles are now in the public domain, but I really hope she turns round to the media and says "yeah I have tits whoop de doo Basil, why don't you nip over to Egypt and report on some REAL news"
Picture faked by adding a skin tone to her bikini and creating a pixelated blur.
No comments:
Post a Comment